Dr Philippa Hyman and Professor Chris Oliver from the School of Psychology, University of Birmingham conducted a study into the most common types of challenging behaviors shown by people with CdLS. It aimed at increasing understanding of the different behaviors but especially self-injurious behavior. Postal questionnaires were sent to over 200 parents and carers via the CdLS Foundation (UK).
In previous studies, self-injurious behavior (SIB) has been reported at high levels in CdLS and is considered to be strongly associated with syndrome. However, some other studies have reported no SIB in CdLS. Therefore, it is unclear to parents, carers and the medical professionals just common this behavior is.
Additionally, other behaviors that may be of concern to parents, such as physical aggression or destruction of property have not been examined in detail.
In relation to SIB, a number of theories have tried to explain why some people self-injure, but so far no theory has been widely accepted.
Some doctors believe that self-injury is a means of communicating to others (for example that the individual wants social interaction from a parent). The theory argues that the self-injury is adopted as behavior because the individual does not have adequate verbal communication skills to express needs. Thus, the individual learns that they can gain a response from a carer if they engage in self-injurious behavior. This theory suggests that the self-injurious behavior is under the person's control. Interventions aimed at altering other people's responses to the SIB, and helping the individual who self-injures to improve communication have proved successful for some people but a number of individuals continue to self-injure when these treatment strategies have been tried.
This failure of some treatments has led researchers to believe that there may be more complex causes of SIB and this might indicate that different treatment strategies are needed. A number of research papers have described the severe nature of SIB in CdLS, and have argued that the behavior is outside of the control of the individual and perhaps ‘compulsive'. If the SIB was found to be a ‘compulsive' behavior this would have clinical implications because it would suggest that for some individuals the SIB might require different treatments. Evidence for this theory is that some individuals who self-injure also attempt to stop themselves from doing so. This is called self-restraint and examples include wrapping arms in clothing and sitting on hands.
This became the second aim of our study - to examine whether individuals with CdLS showing SIB also engaged in self-restraint, which might suggest that the self-injurious behavior was not within their control.
We also looked at whether those showing SIB and self-restraint also showed more compulsive behaviors.
86 carers of individuals with CdLS recruited via the CdLS Foundation (UK), completed questionnaires regarding the occurrence of challenging behaviors in those they cared for. The main caregiver who responded was the mother for 62 (72.1%) people and the father for 9 (10.5%). Of the 86 individuals with CdLS that were identified, 45 (52.3%) were female and 41 (47.7%) were male. Individuals ranged in age from 1 to 38 years old, and the average age was 12˝. 79 (91.9%) individuals were living at home.
The most common behavior reported was self-injurious behavior (SIB) displayed by 54 (62.8%) individuals. The average age of those showing SIB was 14.2, which was higher than for individuals who did not display SIB. The prevalence of other challenging behaviors is shown in Table 1.
Conclusions
The new research program should cover these points.
Table 1. The number and percentage people with CdLS showing each form of challenging behavior.
| Behavior | No. of Individuals (%) |
| Self-injurious behavior | 54 (62.8) |
| Stereotyped behavior | 49 (57.0) |
| Destructive behavior | 45 (52.3) |
| Physical aggression | 36 (41.9) |
Table 2. Number (%) of people with CdLS showing the most frequently reported types of compulsion.
| Type of compulsion | Frequency (%) |
| Insists on closing open doors | 36 (41.9) |
| Touches or taps item repeatedly | 35 (40.7) |
| Uses same chair or location | 34 (39.5) |
| Arranges objects in a certain pattern | 27 (31.4) |
| Wants chairs in a fixed arrangement | 27 (31.4) |